Monitoring maize yields in Zambia from space

Our paper in Remote Sensing shows that cheap, task-agnostic satellite features can track maize yield variation across Zambia over both space and time, and handle the time dimension much better than NDVI does.

Publication
Remote Sensing
Machine Learning
Agriculture
Africa
MOSAIKS
Author
Published

November 25, 2025

Our paper, Monitoring Maize Yield Variability over Space and Time with Unsupervised Satellite Imagery Features, is now out in Remote Sensing. It started as our MEDS capstone project and grew into a full paper with Juliet Cohen, Grace Lewin, Steven Cognac, Protensia Hadunka, Jonathan Proctor, and Tamma Carleton.

The question

Zambia is prone to severe droughts and crop failures, but ground data on yields is limited. During COVID-19, for example, district-level maize surveys stopped entirely. Methods like MOSAIKS make it cheap to turn satellite imagery into features for prediction. Until now, though, nobody had tested whether these simple pipelines can track change over time in a low-data, developing-country setting. Most evaluations only look at variation across space.

What we did

We computed random convolutional features from Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery and paired them with district-level yield data. We then fit plain linear ridge regression models. There is no deep learning and no task-specific architecture.

What we found

Scatter plot of model-estimated versus observed log maize yields for Zambian districts from 2016 to 2021, colored by year, with marginal histograms. Points cluster along the 1:1 line; R squared is 0.83.

Out-of-sample model estimates vs. observed district maize yields in Zambia, 2016–2021 (R² = 0.83). From Molitor et al. (2025), Remote Sensing.
  • The model explains 83% of out-of-sample maize yield variation from 2016 to 2021. That is slightly better than a model built on NDVI features, the standard approach practitioners use to monitor crop health.
  • The real difference shows up over time. When predicting year-to-year variation alone, our model keeps an R² of 0.74, while the NDVI model drops to 0.39.

Why it matters

Monitoring droughts and food security depends on catching change from year to year. Our results show that task-agnostic featurization can capture that change even where ground truth is sparse and compute is limited. Imagery-based monitoring can work in exactly the places where expensive approaches are out of reach.

Citation: Molitor, C., Cohen, J., Lewin, G., Cognac, S., Hadunka, P., Proctor, J., Carleton, T. (2025). Monitoring Maize Yield Variability over Space and Time with Unsupervised Satellite Imagery Features. Remote Sensing, 17(21), 3641. doi:10.3390/rs17213641